Prepare for class
Review the material facts, questions presented, and reasoning before discussing the case.
Case briefs for studying law
Get the facts, legal issues, and court’s reasoning in one organized brief—with supporting passages you can open as you read.
Search and read the example without an account. Brief generation is in private beta. Request access
36 Cal. 4th 224 (2005) · California Supreme Court
The foreseeability required depends on the burden of the precaution. Simple measures may require less foreseeability than hiring security guards.
The court still had to consider reasonable, simple precautions against an imminent assault—not just whether the bar had a duty to hire guards.
Condensed from the curated example. Read the full brief and supporting passages →
Prefer the full opinion?
CaseReaderAI is a separate reading experience. Get the full opinion, listen at your pace, and explore selected passages in plain English.
AI analysis requires an enabled provider and access. Reading and listening are available independently.
For your reading
Make a difficult reading easier to work through and easier to revisit before class.
Review the material facts, questions presented, and reasoning before discussing the case.
Use the brief to get your bearings, then read the passages that need a closer look.
Keep the rule, its application, and the result together when you review the case later.
See the result
Explore Delgado v. Trax Bar & Grill, a California Supreme Court case about a bar’s duty to protect a patron from an imminent assault.
Before you start
Access, supported files, and how to use a brief responsibly.
You can open the workspace and search for cases before entering a key. Brief generation is available to private beta users. Enter your beta access key, or sign in if you have an account, before briefing a selected opinion or uploading a file. To request access, email casebrieferai@gmail.com.
Email casebrieferai@gmail.com. For an incorrect brief, include the case name, public source link, and the statement that needs review. Please do not send confidential documents or your access key.
A case name or reporter citation is the best starting point. You can also paste an approved public-opinion link or upload a PDF, DOCX, TXT, or Markdown opinion file up to 12 MB. PDFs need selectable text. Use public, nonconfidential opinions. If a search has no matches, try the full case name or citation.
No. Briefs can contain mistakes or omit important context. Use them alongside the full opinion, check citations, and verify important statements before relying on them.
No. Each public brief is based on one selected opinion. It does not establish how later decisions or changes in the law affect that case. Verify the full controlling opinion and current law before relying on the brief.
Search covers a collection of published court opinions. Coverage is not exhaustive or continuously updated. Case names and reporter citations are the best starting points. If a case is missing, you can supply a supported public-opinion link or a text-bearing opinion file. Source availability and completeness vary.
Use public, nonconfidential opinions only. Uploaded text is processed on our servers and may be sent to OpenAI to prepare your brief; provider retention policies apply. Uploads are not added to the searchable case collection. Copy your brief before closing the workspace.
Search by name or citation, or read the sample brief first.